The system can create quantum-correlated photons from sunlight.

"Correlated photon pairs, generated via sunlight-pumped spontaneous parametric down-conversion in a nonlinear crystal, demonstrate ghost imaging. Credit: W. Zhang (Xiamen University) (ScitechDaily, Scientists Just Used Sunlight To Pull Off a Quantum Physics Feat Once Thought Impossible)

Ability to create quantum correlated photons using sunlight. That thing is one of the most incredible things. Quantum-correlated photons can be a new tool. For many applications. Quantum entanglements can transport energy out of the system. With ultimate accuracy. That can make it possible to control energy levels in things like Rydberg atoms. Rydberg atoms can make it possible to create an atom-sized quantum processor. 

But those quantum-correlated photons. They can make many other things. 

They can be used for quantum encryption, where the system sends information in the form of an image. The binary version works like this. If the information is sent as an image of Mickey Mouse. And the decoding algorithm accepts only this image. The system can send zero and one by blinking the image. 

If the image that the receiver sees is Mickey, it accepts the mark. But if the system sees. Some other image. It will not decrypt that data. This means that the transmitter must use a certain image. That  it can get a message through the filter. The encryption protects messages. But that protects the receiver from the harmful information. 

This type of technology. Makes the GSM telephones possible. The GSM system can send data to multiple cell phones by using the same frequency. The system uses encrypted data packages. And if the encryption key for the message is wrong, the cell phone doesn’t accept that data package. The quantum system. It makes the same thing possible in optical data transmission. 

In regular binary microchips, the higher energy level means one. And the lower energy level means zero.

But

What if a lower energy level means one and a higher means zero? 

AI-based operating systems. It can make it possible to create computers with a lower energy level. It means one in a binary system. And a higher energy level means zero. That. Oppositely, a way to think. It can make the system more secure and faster. 

And maybe in the future we can program robots. By putting them in front of computer screens. And then. The screen sends the information to the robot. By adjusting the image and light level. 

If we think oppositely. We can make faster computer processors. This means that if the computer thinks. That lower energy level in a binary system is one, and the higher is zero. That helps to separate. If the system sends zero. Or electricity is cut. 

A certain light level can mean one. And another level can be zero. If the system uses an AI-based operating system, a higher light level, or a brighter screen, it can mean zero. And the lower light level. It can mean one. This. Kind of opposite. Way to think. It can help to solve the problem of zero. If the lower energy level is one and the upper is zero, that can make it easier to detect if the system is shut down. When the energy level is lower than a certain value, that means one. And if there is no electricity in the wire, the system interprets that. As a cut of electricity in the wire. 

And one of those applications is the protective field. Which we can call that thing. The extremely low-energy quantum-corrected photons can pull energy from the cosmic rays before they hit the spacecraft. These kinds of photon clouds can also protect quantum entanglements in quantum computers. They can pull energy out from radiation that disturbs the quantum systems. And that decreases interferences. 

And another thing is this. If. A low-energy photon swarm can be shot against the laser beams that photon swarm can pull energy out from that beam. This means that. These kinds. Of extreme. Low-energy photons. They can deny the use of the laser scanners. Or control energy levels in one radiation string. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-just-used-sunlight-to-pull-off-a-quantum-physics-feat-once-thought-impossible/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rydberg_atom

Are you ready for the new advances in the military world?

Su-57 “Felon”

The problem with the Russian military is that. It learns from its mistakes. There is a hole in Western defense. Western military requires. An Hesa Shahed-136-type drone that can be cheap. And easy to produce. The Russian military uses those drones in both deep-penetrating and tactical missions. The Shahed uses infrared and remote control guidance systems. There might be versions with the anti-radiation guidance systems. That ammunition can fly over the battlefield. And when somebody opens the radio or ECM system, the drone will attack those jammer stations. The Russian Shahed-136 drones are laying anti-tank mines. 

Shahed-136

The fact is that these kinds of systems are quite easy to jam. But there is a possibility. Shahed drones will get new frightening updates. Things like high-explosive anti-tank (HEAT) warheads allow those drones to attack armoured targets. There is a possibility that some drones can have. The neutron-bomb-based HEAT warheads can aim high-energy plasma at the target. These types of systems can be dangerous to large warships or bunkers. 

Geran-3

The lack of artificial intelligence can make those drones deadlier than they already are. The large-sized drones are easy to transform. Into systems that are immune to jammers. The system can use a terrain-contour matching (TERCOM) system, which is combined with an inertial navigation system. The AI allows the creation of a system that can automatically. Attack ground- or aerial targets. 

The jet-engine-powered glide bombs: The UMPK-PD under a Su-34 Fullback, with an extended tubular section believed to hold the turbojet engine. (Image credit: Telegram/X)(The Avionist)

Those drones. A future version of Geran-3 type drones. That drone can have afterburners that allow it to reach supersonic speed. It can be dangerous. Against large-sized aircraft and other targets. Russia claims. It has given updates to the Su-57. And we can certainly hope that those updates are not Geran-3 jet drones under the wings of that aircraft. 

Russian Drones

Russia creates a new military branch to develop drone warfare. This is one of the things that we should realize. Drones are becoming more. And more intelligent and lethal. Russians developed the jet-engined glide bombs. Those emerged Ukrainian warriors. But there is a possibility that the Russian government is researching the possibility of their new Jet-engined Geran-3 drones. Can be installed on Su-35 or Su-57. The range of Geran-3 is over 1000 km. And that will give those jet fighters ultimate long-range strike capacity. 

Su-34 "Fullback"

The fact is that the artificial intelligence-based homing systems. Thar uses the image-recognition system in the last part of the trajectory. It could be an even more lethal system. If the large-sized drone uses the inertial navigation at the beginning of its route, and finalizes its mission with an image-recognition system. It is a very nasty tool. The AI-based systems allow the drone to select the route and formation that are as hard as possible. To defenders. 

Su-35 "Flanker E/M" or, "Super Flanker"

https://defensemirror.com/news/39493/Russia_s_Geran_3_Jet_Powered_Kamikaze_Drone_Ready_for_Operations

https://theaviationist.com/2025/10/25/russia-new-jet-powered-glide-bomb/

https://www.twz.com/air/su-57-with-new-upgrade-options-russia-claims-first-foreign-delivery-has-already-occurred

https://www.twz.com/news-features/russia-creates-new-military-branch-dedicated-to-drone-warfare

https://www.twz.com/news-features/russias-jet-powered-shahed-kamikaze-drone-is-a-big-problem-for-ukraine

https://www.twz.com/air/russias-shahed-long-range-drones-are-now-dropping-anti-tank-mines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HESA_Shahed_136

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-34

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-35

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sukhoi_Su-57

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TERCOM

Measurement of energy levels in a quantum clock requires much more energy than its running.

“Researchers found that measuring a quantum clock consumes vastly more energy than the clock’s own operation—up to a billion times more. Scientists learned that reading a quantum clock requires orders of magnitude more energy than running it. This surprising imbalance reveals that observation itself shapes the flow and thermodynamics of time. Credit: SciTechDaily.com“ (ScitechDaily, Researchers found that measuring a quantum clock consumes vastly more energy than the clock’s own operation—up to a billion times more.)

The energy cost in quantum timekeeping is. An interesting thing. The requirement for successful quantum technology is the ability to measure energy levels in quantum structures. The quantum-size clocks are required. If we want to make atomic-sized microchips. In those microchips, transistors can involve only three atoms. And those three atoms can form the emitter, base, and collector. If those atomic-size structures are possible. 

That is the revolution in technology. But those systems require quantum-sized clocks that synchronize their operations. The quantum-sized. Or nanosized microchips are similar things. As the so-called regular microchips. Their size is just smaller. They also require very accurate clocks. Quantum clocks can also be used. In the new types of pocket-sized inertial navigation systems. The system must only  measure the beginning position and the speed of the actor. 

The gyroscope registers the changes in direction. And the system uses a clock to measure the distance. Of the traveling. The system calculates the speed and the time. The actor uses the (s=vt) (Journey = speed*time) formula to calculate the journey, or the vector between two waypoints. The system can handle.  Even hundreds of waypoints. That gives inertia high accuracy.

The inertia determines the beginning point and measures the speed. And the simplest way to make that kind of measurement. If the speed changes. Is to determine the.New beginning point . Every time the speed and direction change. 

This system makes it possible. To create a GPS-free system that is impossible to jam. The problem with those systems is that clocks and gyroscopes should be small enough. The system should involve at least two gyroscopes. When the actor changes direction. The system switches the gyroscope and starts the new measurement series. The system requires a speed meter that can be a radar. Or a laser-based system . That allows users to use this inertial even while walking. 

https://scitechdaily.com/scientists-uncover-a-hidden-energy-cost-in-quantum-timekeeping/

Curvity is the new way to control the drone swarms.

  Curvity is the new way to control the drone swarms. 

"Illustration of robots advancing artificial swarm intelligence inspired by the collective behaviors of birds, fish, and bees."(Rude Baguette, “Curvity Controls Robot Interactions”: Researchers Develop New Framework Allowing Robotic Swarms to Mimic Bird and Fish Group Behaviors)

Drone swarms could be the tool that can make almost everything. The idea is that drones can cooperate and connect their computing capacity when they must make complex decisions. Then the swarm can share missions to individual drones. When we think about robot swarms that can mimic things like bird swarms, those robots must know their position in the swarm. The answer to that question can be curvature or curvity. Rude Baguette tells the next things about curvity. 

“A key innovation of the study is the introduction of a new quantity termed “curvity.” This intrinsic charge-like quality allows a robot to curve in response to external forces, guiding its interactions with fellow robots. Each robot is assigned a positive or negative curvity value, which determines its behavior within the swarm. This innovative approach allows for the collective behavior of the swarm to be controlled, whether it involves flocking, flowing, or clustering.”  (Rude Baguette, “Curvity Controls Robot Interactions”: Researchers Develop New Framework Allowing Robotic Swarms to Mimic Bird and Fish Group Behaviors)

Assistant Professor Stefano Martiniani from New York University emphasized the potential of this approach: “This curvature drives the collective behavior of the swarm, potentially controlling whether the swarm flocks, flows, or clusters.” Such a model transforms the challenge of controlling swarms from complex programming into a material science issue, opening new avenues for research and application.” (Rude Baguette, “Curvity Controls Robot Interactions”: Researchers Develop New Framework Allowing Robotic Swarms to Mimic Bird and Fish Group Behaviors)

Sharing the system into substructures that mimic galactic groups makes it easier to create programs for robots. Each layer or level acts as one robot. 

The system can involve the next type of information. 

“You are a robot of robot group 9. Robots 1 and 2 must be ahead of you. And robot 4 must be on the left side of you. Together, you are Robot Swarm 2, and Swarms 1 must be on your side, and Swarms 3 and 4 must be behind you. Together, your place is in layer 3. That layer must be between layer 2 and 4.” Then the system has other algorithms that tell what to do if one drone is lost. 

The key question is how the robot can determine its position within the swarm. In this case, the modular structure is the solution. There can be multiple data levels, which makes the data structure operate as a mosaic. Or, rather, we can say that the structure mimics the universe. There are individual drones that are galaxies in galactic clusters. Then those drone clusters form a local cluster. Then, local clusters form a super cluster. And then the superclusters form a global cluster. Those clusters are the drone swarms. The ability to share the groups into subgroups makes it easier to program those drones. 

The idea is that the drones can form three or four drone groups. The individual drone knows. What drones are behind it, and what drones are ahead of it? The drone group acts like one drone. And then it must know what drone group is ahead and behind it. Then the drone group must know. Whether it should be above or below some of the other drones. The system can make that quite easily. It can share the drone swarm into layers. And those drones know their own layer. And then they know what drones should be below and what should be above it. Those drones can operate in squares. That can look like randomly changing forms. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/09/curvity-controls-robot-interactions-researchers-develop-new-framework-allowing-robotic-swarms-to-mimic-bird-and-fish-group-behaviors/

Every object in orbit could be an ASAT weapon.

  Every object in orbit could be an ASAT weapon. 

Researchers are worried. That China’s space-debris catcher can turn into an ASAT, an Anti-Satellite weapon. A debris catcher can also hijack other satellites. And that is the risk for national security. Satellites are vulnerable targets in modern warfare. They also play a key role in detecting enemies and providing communication datalinks and location services for both military and civilian services. The radar satellites can also detect their own troops if they carry a transponder that shows their location to radar satellites. The problem with radar satellites is that those satellites are easy to knock out. The ASAT missile can have similar systems what regular anti-radiation missile uses when it attacks regular targets. 

The drone swarms are things that require satellite-based communication and that advance and accelerate the development of anti-satellite weapons. In some models, high-power radars send EMP pulses against satellites. High-power radar impulses can destroy the satellite's electronics. Or the system can form an electric arc around the satellite. There are systems that push satellites into the atmosphere. In the Cold War era, the Soviets made so-called “Almaz” tests. where their satellites and Almaz-space stations, like Salyut 5, tested things like machine guns against satellites. There is a possibility that some miniature shuttles have ASAT roles in the military world. 

Things like Fractional Orbital Bombardment Systems, FOBS, causes the need for rapid reaction ASAT systems that can take these kinds of things out from orbit. The Chinese space shuttle made a flight with groups of mysterious objects, and that could be the test. There, the shuttle releases  and collects FOBS weapons, “space mines,” from the orbiter. The space mine means the structure whose purpose is to close the orbiter. Sometimes, miniature satellites that the kevlar wires connect together are planned for that mission. The problem is that the space mine must be removed when own operations begin. The nukes that are positioned into the orbiter can also be used to destroy other satellites and create EMP pulses that purpose it take the defense systems out. 

Things like laser systems are used to blind satellites. But there have been systems created that can destroy a targeted satellite. Those lasers and other electromagnetic systems can have megawatt-scale power. The orbital laser-satellite, with similar lasers. Used in the metal industry can cut and damage other satellites' solar panels. 

This is one thing that we must realize. And the second thing is that every object in the orbiter is an ASAT weapon. The simplest ASAT system is the satellite that collides with another satellite. This makes micro-satellites a perfect weapon. They are tools that can observe other satellites, but they can also act as ammunition, when they collide with another satellite in the case of war. Another thing is that the simple but effective version of the kinetic energy weapons is the space shotgun. In some other versions, the system uses a giant net to capture and push the satellite out of its trajectory. 

The system uses a rocket engine. The system pumps metal balls to the nozzle. And then the exhaust gas will send those balls against the targeted satellites. Or the system can use Claymore mines. To shoot metal balls at targeted satellites. Or those satellites can rocket salvos against satellites. In some visions, the system can drive a large magnet that pulls ions from the Van Allen belt to the targeted satellites. In some versions, the regular rocket transports a large number of metal balls to the orbital trajectory, making it useless. 

The problem with the ASAT weapons is this. The orbital trajectory is full of debris. Things like debris-cleaners whose purpose is to remove space junk are also excellent ASAT systems. The satellite can be put in the plastic bag, made of mylar. And then the small satellite simply pulls it into the atmosphere. The flying garbage can that takes a satellite in the tank and returns it to the atmosphere is the thing that can hijack satellites. And that system can take them to the ground for investigations. The satellite hijackers can be used to steal data from the captured satellites. 

Things like manipulator arms are things. The system can be used to push other satellites into the atmosphere. And in some visions. The satellites that carry hypersonic parachutes for return and recycle their components can also capture other satellites into those parachutes and take their targets with them. The parachutes can make it possible to research the microchips' sustainability against cosmic radiation. The problem is that the directed energy plasmoid weapons can cause similar damage to the solar plasma flow. The plasmoid weapon can knock out other satellites. And those kinds of things can be misidentified, caused by  solar wind. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/08/watched-net-drift-toward-a-target-in-silence-chinas-space-debris-catcher-sparks-fears-of-covert-anti-satellite-weapon-use/

https://www.twz.com/chinas-spaceplane-has-released-multiple-mystery-objects-in-orbit

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almaz

Chinese highly automated dark factories.

    Chinese highly automated dark factories. 

Chinese dark factories are so highly automated that they don’t even need light. This is the future of manufacturing. Robots working in complete darkness. Those systems are controlled by the AI. And that makes the assembly process very effective. Human-shaped robots can make almost everything that humans can. 

An advanced machine learning toolkit allows operators. To teach machines new things. very effectively. The system needs only one robot. That can make something, and then that system can scale that new skill over the entire network. That makes robots very effective workers. And maybe those ghost factories are starting to operate in Western cities. Robot factories are interesting. Especially if human-shaped robots work in that factory. 

That is the thing. That makes the AI dangerous. The ability to teach one robot and then scale that thing to all robots makes it possible to teach robot armies very effectively. The same human-shaped robot that can make cars. It can act as a robot soldier. That is one thing that we must realize. The second thing is that kinds of highly automated systems can also make other products than cars. The new stealth systems require ultimate secrecy. And the robot workers are a solution to that problem. 

The robot worker doesn’t call the newspaper. If it makes something that is not public. Another thing is that the robot worker can change its role by pressing a button. Flexible CAD/CAM (Computer-Aided Design/ Computer Aided Manufacturing) platforms that turn the CAD drawings straight to the product. Mean that the system can change the product in minutes. The factory involves 3D printers and machine workers. Those systems can make everything. They have instructions and raw materials. Those factories can make cars, aircraft, and other robots. 

That kind of thing can make many things more effectively than humans. That means those systems are the ultimate competitors for Western factories. They can make products without brakes. And that makes them ultimate operators in the military and civil sectors. The Chinese government, like all other actors, might be interested about the robot factory as a military robot producer. There is a possibility that robot factories are installed on ships. and they can build customized robots or other robot factories if they have enough raw materials. Or the ability to search for raw materials from nature. 

New drone carriers are the most dangerous things in the world.

"Illustration of the Jiu Tian drone carrier, the world's largest, poised to revolutionize military operations with drone swarms." (Rude Baguette, “This Isn’t a Ship, It’s a Swarm Factory”: China’s Giant Drone Carrier Alarms Military Analysts Worldwide) The super- and probably hypersonic applications of that system can be more effective than this drone mothership. 

The Chinese drone carrier can be only the beginning of a new type of independent drone swarm carriers. Basically, every type of system can carry drones. Satellites or ballistic missiles can also carry drone capsules. Or things like cluster bomb units can also carry drones. And that makes those systems versatile for many purposes. Regular cargo planes can drop drone swarms from high altitude. 

And things like airships and balloons can also carry capsules that can release drone swarms. A Ukrainian company introduced a small drone boat that carries another drone on its deck. Larger drones can carry more drones than those miniature systems. It’s possible to put quadcopters on the nose of underwater drones and launch those systems underwater. Artificial intelligence gives even small-sized drones the ability to make evasion movements when they detect counterfire. 

Drones can also slip into buildings and observe things like computer screens. Basically, the drone can also insert a USB stick into the targeted system and download computer viruses into that system. A logical bomb is a virus that responds to a certain signal. And that can leave the entire area without defense. A drone can also carry things like a Mesh station. That can link all data that travels on the net to the outsider eavesdropper. 

"Ukrainian unmanned riverine surface drone Ursula, developed by NoviTechNet, carrying a UAV onboard. 2025. Source: YouTube/Association of Ukrainian Engineers." (https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/07/20/drone-boat-ursula/)

NASA plans to drop six helicopters to Mars. But the same technology can be used in drone swarm operations. Images: Rude Baguette

Droneswarms can cause lots of damage in the target areas. The optical fiber makes drones immune to the standard ECM systems. But the high-power EMP can destroy those drones’ electronics. The only weakness of the fiber-optical control system is the wire. If some other drone finds that fiber, it can cut it. Or the laser system can also cut the optical fiber that is behind those drones. But the next step is the AI-controlled drone. The AI allows drones to operate independently without outside control. The laser systems, like optical wireless data transportation, also make it possible to create guidance systems that are hard to jam. 

But those systems require direct contact with the transmitter. This is why things like pseudosatellites or high-altitude platform stations (HAPS) can be the right tools for delivering drone swarms. The HAPS can itself be a robot airplane, balloon, or airship that drops those drone swarms to areas. The drone itself is a multipurpose tool that can search for missing people and give warnings about things like volcanic eruptions. But those systems can also deliver destruction and fear. The high-speed stealth interceptors that can be manned or unmanned systems can deliver drone swarms into the area. Those kamikaze-drones can search and destroy the anti-aircraft systems and keep their crews busy, when the other systems attack harder targets. 

Laser- and microwave-based systems can destroy drone swarms. But those systems must detect drones before they can act. There is always the possibility that drones can travel on the ground or underwater, and then another drone that hits a laser or microwave weapon from behind can destroy those weapons. The power that those systems use should be so high that they destroy the physical components of drone swarms. 

https://euromaidanpress.com/2025/07/20/drone-boat-ursula/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/america-built-it-but-spain-took-it-as-us-space-balloon-pioneer-gets-snapped-up-and-sparks-furious-clash-over-tech-ownership-and-national-pride/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/nasa-calls-it-the-skyfall-maneuver-as-plan-to-drop-6-mars-helicopters-mid-air-divides-experts-and-fuels-outrage-over-billion-dollar-space-risks/

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/this-isnt-a-ship-its-a-swarm-factory-chinas-giant-drone-carrier-alarms-military-analysts-worldwide/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_platform_station

The new drone can operate on land, in the air, and underwater.

"Illustration of a 3D-printed drone transitioning between air and water environments, generated by artificial intelligence." (Rude Baguette)

The new drone can operate on land, in the air, and underwater.

In the 1930s, the Soviet engineers tried to create the aircraft-submarine combination. That system could slip near the target underwater and launch attack systems. Then that system can fly away from that area. The problem was that technology was not advanced enough. But AI-controlled quadcopters can make it possible to create that kind of system. Theoretically, the nuclear-powered systems can make even full-size “flying submarines” possible. The system can use quadcopter technology. The new drone can dive and fly. But there is a possibility to make those drones more versatile than systems that can fly and dive. The new drone can have multiple sensors, such as sonars and radar altimeters, at the propeller frames. 

The quadcopters are less sensitive than helicopters to cases where they hit some walls if their propellers are protected by using frames. The rotating frame allows the system to travel through very narrow points. And if the system can adjust the propeller's position by pulling them together when the robot or quadcopter system swims through a narrow hole, it makes those systems more flexible than a regular helicopter can be. 

 But the smaller systems can make it possible to create systems that can fly, dive, and drive on roads. 

The new drone can operate in the air and underwater. An interesting thing in hydro- and aerodynamics is that using the same dimensions, it is possible to make many sizes of crafts from pocket-size applications to truck-size systems. The next step can be a drone that can drive on roads, fly, and travel underwater, which can slip in places where regular drones cannot operate. Those drones can travel in aircraft safety hangars. And the AI-controlled drones can stay on the ground and wait for the right moment. 

That kind of technology is the new tool for many things, from research to leisure, and military applications. The drone that can turn its propellers to push along the frame can make it possible for those systems to operate underwater. Then the propellers or propeller pairs can turn into positions that make the system a “regular” quadcopter. And finally, when the drone operator wants to drive on the road, the propeller frames act as wheels. Those drones can act as research systems, or they can even transport groups of people. 

The high-tech system operates almost independently. And that makes the system easy to handle. Those systems can be manned or unmanned. And they can be dropped from airships, aircraft, or from submarines. The ability to travel on ground, airborne, or underwater makes it possible for drones to operate in complicated situations. They can observe drain systems. They can travel in caves that can be very narrow. The ability to travel in three elements gives those drones abilities that can be used in some accident, or as a military target. 

Theoretically, that kind of drone can carry even small nuclear explosives.  Those drones can be delivered from some airships or bigger drones. And the thing is that those modern drones can be carried using manned aircraft, or some larger-sized drones, or even satellites. There are many roles that drones can play. They can travel over an area and send wake-up signals to the eavesdropping and surveillance tools that somebody has hidden in offices and other rooms.  

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/this-thing-shouldnt-even-work-viral-student-drone-stuns-engineers-as-it-flies-dives-and-swims-like-a-high-tech-beast/                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    

ESA's new Invictus space plane could be operational in 2031.

ESA's new space plane “Invictus” is one of the next-generation tools for civil and military space missions. The Invictus looks like the Skylon space plane that BAE recently cancelled. The Invictus could be based on technology that was created for Skylon, but the aircraft will have a more capable team working with it. The European Space Agency (ESA) plans to get Invictus airborne and operational at least in 2031. When we think about the Invictus’s role in space missions, we must first look at the cases where the Cold War-era F-4 Phantoms are planned to be used as satellite cargo missions. Those quite fast fighters will climb as high as they can and then launch miniature satellites into orbit. 

The Invictus can also raise similar satellite carriers to the edge of the atmosphere. And then they can launch those satellites far higher than the F-4 or F-15 Eagle. There have been plans to connect auxiliary rocket packs to the F-4 or F-15 that allow them to jump higher before they release the satellite. 

 The Invictus can have rocket-ramjet or more conventional rocket turbojet hybrid systems. The idea in rocket ramjets is that the ramjet engine raises the space plane to the edge of the atmosphere. Then the iris closes the engine face. And then the engine starts to use an internal oxygen source. In rocket turbojets, the system uses normal turbojet engines in atmospheric flight. 

"A US Vought ASM-135 ASAT missile launch on 13 September 1985, which destroyed P78-1" (Wikipedia, Anti-satellite weapon)

Then the system closes the face of the afterburner, and then that system turns the afterburner into a normal rocket. In the simplest engine solution, the aircraft uses turbojets in the atmosphere. When the flight altitude turns high enough, the system turns to use separated rocket engines. The iris at the front of the turbojet is required because the airflow can damage turbine wings. But if developers can install those orbital rocket engines with some other engine type that decreases the weight of the system. 

The staged system, where the aircraft can operate first with turbojets and then turn to ramjet and finally to scramjet, allows it to fly in the atmosphere at a higher speed using atmospheric oxygen. When that space plane jumps out from the atmosphere, it turns to use rocket mode in ramjet engines. 

There is also an idea about high-altitude airships (HAA), or High Altitude platform stations (HAPS), as the satellite launchers. Those airships can rise to altitudes of about 30 kilometers. They can launch bigger satellite carriers than jet fighters. Those platforms can be airships, balloons, or solar-powered aircraft. HAPS can also use things like internal fuel cells. The HAPS can carry a satellite launcher to high altitude and launch it there. 

The idea of aircraft-based satellite launchers is taken from the U.S. military ASAT, Anti-satellite weapon. The F-15 raises that weapon to the highest point of ballistic trajectory and then that system launches the satellite-killer missile. 

The thing in the satellite launchers is that the same systems can also transport anti-satellite (ASAT) systems to orbiters. Satellites are playing a bigger and bigger role in the modern military. Satellites offer reconnaissance information about enemy movements. And there are also killer satellites in space. ASAT systems can take those killer satellites out. So in that case, they play a counterweapon role. But of course, targeting satellites and military communication satellites are good targets for ASAT weapons. 

So, that means anti-satellite weapons will become more important than ever before. The ASAT weapons can also become more vital than ever before because of suspected fractional orbital bombardment systems (FOBS) or EMP weapons that the enemy launches at orbital trajectory. The ASAT system can eliminate those threats. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/theyre-back-from-the-dead-cold-war-f-4-phantoms-revived-to-launch-satellites-and-experts-warn-this-is-military-space-2-0/

https://www.space.com/space-exploration/launches-spacecraft/europe-working-to-launch-invictus-hypersonic-space-plane-by-2031-video

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-satellite_weapon

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-altitude_platform_station

The new rotational detonation engine allows the aircraft to fly 19955,87 km/h.

"“It’s Not a Missile—It’s an Engine”: China Reveals 12,400 MPH Propulsion Tech That Can Orbit the Planet in Under 2 Hours" (Rude Baguette, 

The new Chinese engine innovation allows it to fly at a speed of Mach 16. That kind of dual-mode ramjet allows the aircraft to fly at enormous speeds. This kind of technology also advances in both civil and military aviation. The engine model itself is not Chinese. But Chinese made it effective. 

The hypersonic aircraft can revolutionize cargo and passenger flight. The aircraft can travel around the world in about 2 hours. This thing makes hypersonic aircraft very capable for reconnaissance missions. These kinds of systems are effective and powerful tools for those missions. 

And that means every city and point on Earth is under a maximum 2h flight time. This is one of the biggest things about the complicated hypersonic aircraft. The hypersonic missiles are less complicated than hypersonic aircraft that must withstand temperature changes and the stress of the pressure. The hypersonic aircraft can raise rockets to orbital trajectory. 

They can climb to the ballistic jump outside the atmosphere. And then those things can release the satellite carrier rocket. The problem is that those systems are suitable for anti-satellite missions. And that makes hypersonic aircraft more revolutionary than anybody thought. The hypersonic aircraft can also carry hypersonic missiles and hypersonic gliders that they can use for attacking targets all around the world. The hypersonic aircraft can destroy other aircraft by using its sonic cone. The same way hypersonic aircraft’s sonic cones can be used to knock down conventional subsonic cruise missiles. 

“In 2023, General Electric demonstrated a ramjet with rotating detonation combustion. It is a turbine-based combined-cycle engine that incorporates a gas turbine, rotating detonation engine, ramjet, and scramjet.” (Wikipedia, Ramjet)

The key element in the Chinese new innovation is the dual-mode detonation. Or in other words, rotation detonation engine, RDE. That kind of engine system can make it possible to increase the speed and capacity of the Ramjet engine. Normal ramjets have their speed limit about Mach 7. The RDE can raise the speed of the aircraft higher than ever. The hypersonic aircraft must fly at a very high altitude, because that decreases friction. 

The hypersonic aircraft that can operate both air-breathing and internal oxygen can be the new tool for space systems. The ability to fly at high altitude. Change to the rocket engine, and jump out from atmosphere, allows the creation of a space plane that can travel even to the moon. The space plane can be the holy grail to space engineering and space stations. And other things, like nuclear rockets. Those space planes can be even more revolutionary than hypersonic aircraft. The hypersonic plane can act as the model for those more capable systems. 

https://www.rudebaguette.com/en/2025/07/its-not-a-missile-its-an-engine-china-reveals-12400-mph-propulsion-tech-that-can-orbit-the-planet-in-under-2-hours/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramjet#Aircraft_using_ramjets

Hacking threats to military and civil systems.

Hacking is the new threat in the military and civil world. We can say that the new threat is cyber warfare. And if we are not prepared, that thing can cause many problems. Cyber warfare itself is not a new phenomenon. The idea in that kind of warfare is that the enemy’s computers are infected with computer viruses. Or things. Like homepages that the opposite side uses for sharing information can be loaded with disinformation. 

Cyber intelligence can search for information from enemy equipment, tactics, or key personnel's positions, so that they can be targeted for special forces attacks. Hackers can also search for the positions of important installations. 

Things like energy supply systems are targets for cyber attacks. The modern military uses more and more electricity. The effective combat control systems, like radars and communication platforms, require electricity. But things like new tools, such as laser weapons and drones, also require electricity. The entire system must be protected against cyberattacks. There is a possibility that a hacker who has access to the wrong databases can simply remove those people's access to some systems. Or they can remove the data of the entire military crew. Or in some scenarios, hackers can simply report the key people, like nuclear weapon operators, as dead in an accident, into the system. 

What if the system will not allow them access to the command center?

One example of a destructive cyber attack is an attack that activates power plants' emergency shutdowns. That system can close the energy production in those systems immediately. Basically, hackers can break down things like electric networks by shutting down the main energy production units, like nuclear power plants. That thing activates auxiliary power immediately. When auxiliary power is on, the main energy production units will be activated again. 

Suppose the electric network is not protected against such a situation that causes an overload. So, that is the reason why the electricity must never be loaded onto the electric network from the generator. The other thing is that the electric networks must be based on many small platforms rather than one big central platform. If one of those systems is shut down, the effect on the entire network is smaller. Basically, in the case of a nuclear reactor, only anonymous phone calls to the control room can cause an emergency shutdown. The hacker can say that there is a logic bomb, which means a computer virus that destroys the control program immediately. So, would the reactor crew start to test if those computer viruses are really in the system? 

We have firewalls and antivirus programs. The fact is, if we want to put the computer viruses into the systems, what is needed is a reprogrammed RFID chip or some access card whose microchip is reprogrammed. That thing can transmit a small code that can open the gate to the system. In that case, the small virus will not break the system. It just opens the path to a targeted system. And in some scenarios, the hacker could use the faked VPN connection for that operation if a hacker can somehow fake the computer’s identity to match the computer that has access to the target computer and use a trusted VPN that can allow it to inject malicious code into the system. 

In hacking and computer crimes, productive thinking is the key element. If the hacker can hijack some screens, they can send fake malfunction reports. If the error level of a computer rises and the system reports a damaged hard disk, the system requires service. The attacker can simply try to put an infected hard disk in the computer center. That is one of the threats in computing. If hackers can make their own computer that has access to a targeted system, it can open the road to all data that travels through it. 

 The AI-based firewalls can protect military systems against traditional computer viruses and hackers. But the new threat is nanotechnology. The nanotechnical systems can slip into the computer rooms. They can search the microchips, and then those nanorobots can transmit data that travels through the processors to the controllers. Nanorobots can transmit data to the computers through those microcircuits. Or they can cut microchips off the microcircuits. And then start to transmit their own code to the system. The new tools require new resistance. The nanorobot, or maybe a matchbox-size drone, can travel to the cable connection and detonate itself. That thing can damage the power supply to the computer, or it can cut data communication outside the computer. The drone acts like an anti-radiation missile that can search the WLAN stations and detonate them. 

The artificial lifeforms can be closer than we even dare to think.

"A simplified synthetic equivalent of a cell would be like a blueprint for life. Credit: EVOLF project" (ScitechDaily, Can Life Be Engineered? Biochemists Take Key Steps Toward Synthetic Lifeforms)

Biochemists take their first steps into artificial life forms. The ability to manipulate and connect DNA bites together makes it possible to create artificial species. The nanotechnology plays a key role in that process. Things like genetically engineered bacteria can transport those DNA bites into targeted cells. 

The DNA is the genetic code that controls all actions in the cell. The DNA code can order a cell to die. Nanotechnology makes it possible to clean DNA from genetic errors. That gives the possibility to remove hereditary diseases from society and that thing can decrease things like crime ratio. If researchers can remove the genome that causes things like sociopathy it makes society safer. 

If researchers want to remove genetic diseases from fetuses. They must only take the DNA out from the morula. Then they must clean the DNA and replace the sick sequences using clean sequences. Then they must remove "dirty" DNA from the cell and inject the clean DNA into that cell. 

The same technology allows researchers to inject new abilities into cells. 

When researchers can combine animals and vegetables by connecting their DNA makes it possible to create new species that do not exist in nature. The ability to create synthetic DNA by connecting amino acids using nanotechnical instruments is one of the biggest advances in biotechnology. 

The artificial organism can be bacteria that destroys the tumor cells. Or it can be a mammal with green skin. The green skin gives that creature the photosynthetic ability. The creators of that thing must connect the animal cells with vegetable cells. 

The ability to manipulate the DNA gives researchers free hands to combine organisms and their abilities. When researchers increase their knowledge of the genetic errors that cause cancer or genetic diseases they can use genetic scissors to remove the abnormal DNA. And then. They can connect the wealthy  DNA to that point. 

This thing makes it possible to create many things that have been impossible before. The human who gets the genome transplant that involves a genome that controls gorillas or anaconda's muscle advancement would be the strongest person in the world. 

Maybe those things are still too far away from today's medical and genetic engineering.  But everything starts from the simple organisms. The genetically engineered bacteria can inject the DNA or mRNA into other bacteria or cancer cells ordering those cells to die. There is no resistance to those DNA bites. The same systems and methods can be used in the new types of weapons. Those weapons are the most lethal things in the world. 

https://scitechdaily.com/can-life-be-engineered-biochemists-take-key-steps-toward-synthetic-lifeforms/

AI and robots get a bigger role in the future battlefield.

The AI successfully flew the F-16 for 17 hours. 

The next-generation version of the fully automatized war machines is probably the AI-controlled jet fighter. The AI control can be useful in kamikaze- drone fighters that can be retired fighters that would be scrapped anyway. And that kind of drone is suitable for kamikaze missions. The kamikaze drones can also use sub-missiles against air defense or some other targets in their route. 

Still today human pilot wins the AI. But the fact is that AI is under development. The R&D process requires information collected from the tests. And the tests and follow-up data analysis with a multi-professional team where pilots, AI developers, and other technical and military specialists analyze data and then make the next plans and changes in systems. 

The major problem with the systems is that they are mechanically repeating. When a human pilot learns the mechanical and frequently repeating moves that target is easy to shoot down. But AI advances. And the success of drones in Ukraine is making it necessary to re-estimate the drones. Even if the drone's primary role is target recognition and fire control. It can equip with missiles. 

That forces the air defense to shoot the drone. Small-size quadcopters that drop hand grenades to enemy positions are also effective tools. Those drones can communicate with controllers by using radio systems or they can use laser communication. And laser communication tools can use for target marking and laser sights. 

Above: GLSDB

The laser sight is also suitable for laser microphones. And that makes this system a multipurpose tool. They can search for snipers from the roofs. And if those systems are armed, they can be extremely dangerous. Those quadcopters can take out snipers and destroy enemy positions. And that system can also detect enemy vehicles for artillery and aircraft. 

The quadcopter can drop from satellites, and if they have satellite-based communication that allows them to locate and attack targets, and observe secured areas. That location is on the other side of the world. The system can try to drop the bomb inside the hatches of missile silos. And that can damage or destroy the rocket inside its silo. 

In the future, the SDBs (Small-Diameter Bombs) can be shot against enemy targets from thousands of kilometers away from their targets with pinpoint accuracy. And those systems can terminate even single tanks or other vehicles from another side of the world. 

AI is the game changer. The next-generation versions of the Maverick missiles can have fire-and-forget mode. That kind of system is possible to create, by driving the similar guidance system that Javelin missiles use to those old-fashion missiles. 

Satellites can also point targets by using lasers. Or they can drop the GPS-controlled drone on the target's roof. And then those drones can aim at the position of the target. Another possibility is that drone sends radio signals for radar-homing missiles. That means drones operate like transponders. That thing can give even naval missiles good accuracy. And it's luck that Russians don't use that technology. 

The new tool on the battlefield is Ground-Launched Small-Diameter Bomb or GLSDB. The missile can shoot a small-diameter bomb to 250 kilometers away from the launch site. A similar technology used in GLSDB can install in ICBM missiles. That makes it possible to destroy targets with pinpoint accuracy from thousands of kilometers. 

There is the possibility that the conventional glide bombs. That is equipped with heat shields that can drop from orbiting trajectories. Also, modern nuclear weapons can use similar technology. That is used in pinpoint accurate bombs. The JDAM with nuclear detonator already exists. And the most modern nuclear weapons are very small. 

General Petraeus predicts that the use of robots become more general. And that means many tactics that are made for military and police work must be re-estimated. In the wrong hands, those tools are extremely dangerous weapons. They can use for searching for things like weapons and in the same way, as soldiers use them, they are suitable for the mafia and other kinds of criminals. So criminal organizations can use small drones as strikes. 

Robot aircraft are not a new thing.

Robot aircraft are not a new thing. But independently operating AI-controlled jet fighters are the new thing. Remote-controlled drones used for a long time for a strike, recon, and target missions. There are mainly three types of robot aircraft. The two first are in service or entering service very soon. The third one is just under development. 

Cruise missiles are also kamikaze drones. And they should be easy to shoot down. But those weapons are still in use, even if the human pilot should shoot them like in targeting practice. The bomber drone is the only modified cruise missile that drops smart bombs like JDAMs or SDBs to target. 

X-47

1) Remote-controlled drones. Those drones are radio-controlled aircraft. That requires time for communication between the drone and its operator. The multi-channel- or laser-based communication systems make those systems a little bit more complicated to jam than in movies. 

2) Semituatomatic drones. The killer drones are mainly this type of system. The drone will get flight parameters to some area, and when it recognizes something suspicious it tells that an operator. 

Semi-automatic drones can also be manned aircraft where an active radar-based altimeter keeps the right distance to the ground. So the system corrects the errors that the pilot can make. 

One version of that kind of system is the aircraft-operating ASAT. The military command center's supercomputers control the missile and the aircraft. There the computer calculates the impact point of the missile and satellite. Then the command center the aircraft's course which makes it possible to hit the satellite at the right point. 

Also, things like optical-seeker bombs can have semi-automatic launching systems. The mission downloaded to the weapon. And if the seeker notices a hostile target that system opens fire. The system is similar to face recognition software. And it can be found in Israeli Spice-class glide bombs. Or developers can easily modify those systems for that purpose. 

3) Full automatized AI-controlled drones. Those drones are not yet suitable for complicated missions. But R&D work around those systems is going on. That means the game is changing. And those systems are powerful tools. Even if there are many problems with prototypes, the purpose of tests is to collect data for the developers so that they can fix errors in the code and find the problems. 

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/02/14/opinions/petraeus-how-ukraine-war-ends-bergen-ctpr/index.html

https://www.foxnews.com/science/aviation-milestone-artificial-intelligence-flew-modified-f-16-fighter-jet-17-hours

https://defensescoop.com/2023/02/14/ai-agents-take-control-of-modified-f-16-fighter-jet/

https://www.saab.com/products/ground-launched-small-diameter-bomb-glsdb

https://www.kauppalehti.fi/uutiset/kokenut-amerikkalaiskenraali-cnnlle-ukrainan-sota-paljastaa-sodankaynnin-muutoksen-seuraukset-voivat-olla-karuja/500ef635-737c-4558-bd7c-b6c7a5193954

Link to  Gen. Petraeus interview: 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=1Lb2mAJ3bQs

https://changeanditsmanagement.blogspot.com/

Misunderstandings and AI.

 

There is a new law in California that denies misleading marketing. That is important. In cases where new highly automatized automobiles are sold to regular customers, the misunderstanding causes terrible situations. If customers don't realize that the AI-controlled autopilot cannot drive independently. And humans must control the vehicle in city areas. 

That thing can cause problems or accidents. So if the human just starts to sleep and lets autopilot handle situations, the result is a crash. When people are starting to use some AI-controlled tools or vehicles, they must get enough information about the real capacities of those systems. 

Especially city areas are complicated for vehicles. There are millions of things that can happen suddenly. And programmers must notice all of those situations. If situations like balls come suddenly to the front of the vehicle not described to the program code, that causes a risky situation because if the AI doesn't recognize risks it's dangerous. 

The difference between self-driving cars and Chat GPT-type artificial intelligence is that Chat GPT is a virtual product. If the Chat GPT makes something wrong that thing doesn't make physical damage. But if the AI-controlled car makes mistakes, that thing causes dramatic situations. 

Making AI-controlled killer robots is easier than making an AI-controlled car that transfers people and merchandise from point A to point B. This is an interesting thing about robotics and AI. A destroyer is easier to create than something positive and creative. The fact is that most of the AI and robot programs are not serving the military. But the only thing that people are noticing are killer robots. 

People notice negative things better than positive ones. When we think about Fritz Haber, chemist, and researcher. That man created the Haber-Bosch synthesis along with Carl Bosch. Haber-Bosch method means ammonia synthesis that allows the creation of synthetic fertilizers. 

That method could save billions of people because it allows the growing of corn more effectively. But the same man has the nickname "father of chemical warfare". He created chemical weapons during WW1. But after WW1 that man earned a Nobel prize. 

Same way, we see AI as a threat to humanity. But then we must ask what is the threat, that AI causes or forms? Is that threat the mass unemployment? Or is it something that we cannot even confess? Is that threat that we lost our position in other people's eyes? If robots are starting to make all the dirty work like cleaning and other low-paid jobs, we must ask ourselves, would we make those jobs?

Does AI take jobs from poor people? Or does it only take away the people from the workplaces to who we normally compare ourselves? That means that the lowest step from workplaces will be removed and replaced by using machines. 

https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/tesla-elon-musk-self-driving-ban-b2252223.html

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Which one is better F-35 or the Su-57?

F-35 Lightning II

The thing is that the development of new concepts is not a very easy mission. At least, if that concept travels over Mach 2. The problem with jet fighters or multi-role jet fighters is that they are much more than some aerodynamic bodies. Things like computers, computer programs, and other kinds of things must operate in a very highly complicated entirety. 

If there are some kind of errors in those systems and their cooperation. That thing can cause destruction. The artificial intelligence that controls weapon systems and avionics should make these kinds of things more complicated than ever before. 

In manned aircraft, artificial intelligence can deny the aircraft touch ground in low-level flight. The radar- or lidar-based altimeter, along with the AI-boosted computer keeps the aircraft over the ground. If the flight altitude is only a couple of meters. So the AI fixes errors that the pilot can make. It can detect incoming missiles and start counter-actions if the pilot doesn't notice them. 

When we think of the Su-57, it can be very capable against old fashion jetfighters like F-16, Panavia Tornado, or F/A-18. But the thing is that those old-fashion-looking aircraft can also have updates like AI-based avionics or fire control. 

The reality is that capacity of the Su-57 will be seen only when it faces some jet fighter in air combat. And another thing that means in those situations is the pilot's skills and also how the jetfighter can operate with its support teams like air defense.

Su-57

"Black Swan" in air combat. When extremely extraordinary situations give wrong signals. 

When we look at history. The first British aircraft that dropped Messerschmitt Bf-109 in air combat was the Fairey Battle. The Fairey Battle was not a very big success. And maybe that was the only case when that aircraft dropped another aircraft. 

The detail of that case was that the rear-gunner of Fairey Battle dropped that Messerschmitt. But that victory was the first RAF air victory in WWII. If we look only at that case we might believe that Fairey Battle was a good combat aircraft. It was not a good plane at all. It served as a training aircraft and target tug in WWII. 

If we want to compare that case with something ordinary we can take a case where the goalkeeper of the ice-hockey team makes the goal. We always remember that kind of goal because they are extraordinary.  We don't even remember, was that team won or lose that match, or who made other goals. Those other goals are ordinary things. But that only goal that the goalkeeper made is what we remember. And the reason for that is that goal was extraordinary. 

Fairey Battle had been withdrawn from service in 1940. But that case shows that we should not make generalizations by using one example. That means that the "Black Swans" or extremely good luck can give false signals from the aircraft's capacities or some other equipment. 

There are billions of things that can go wrong in combat between two aircraft. The pilot can simply make mistakes and fly straight to the front of other aircraft or impact the ground. Or some hydraulic tubes can come off. Because somebody forgot tight the connector.

https://www.rbth.com/science-and-tech/333685-su-57-vs-f-35

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fairey_Battle

Images: https://www.rbth.com/science-and-tech/333685-su-57-vs-f-35

https://designandinnovationtales.blogspot.com/

Time machine and the mechanics behind it.

Time travel to the future is quite a simple thing. We must just accelerate the object to the speed of light. And that thing stops time. So how to travel backward in time? One version is simple. The speed just stops the time in a capsule and waits until the sun erupts as a nova. That energy tsunami will send that hypothetical time machine back in time. 

Another way to make an energy tsunami is to make the craft travel at about 99% of the speed of light. And then detonate antimaterial inside it. That system can increase the energy level of the craft to the level that it virtually crosses the speed of light. 

In some visions, saucer-shaped craft would have a particle accelerator on its edge. Then the speed of those particles will reach the speed of light the antimatter annihilation will increase the energy level of that craft to the level that it virtually crosses the speed of light. And that thing causes the opposite time dilaton. 

The idea of the famous time machine of H.G Wells is a very simple thing. The rotating plate causes time dilation in the system. And then the time machine can go forward in time. When we are thinking about the system that will rotate at about 90-99% of the speed of light, that system can almost stop time inside it. So how to put the time machine traveling back in time? 

If our theoretical time traveler can stop time in the time machine that person can simply wait until the Sun is grown into a red giant. And finally when the Sun will erupt as nova the energy tsunami that comes from the star will push the time machine back in time. 

Above is the train to the future. Theoretically is possible to make the hyper-loop type train that travels in vacuum. The train will accelerate to the speed of light by using magnetic track. So the system is like particle acceleator. 

That kind of system could make train travel so fast that time inside it stops. To return to the past, the system must just create a situation where the train will virtually cross the speed of light. 

When it's time to travel back in time the system injects antimatter and material inside the chamber that is inside the train. That increases its energy to a level that the train starts to travel backward in time. 

There is the possibility, that our hypothetical time traveler could stop time in the machine by using two-way rotating plasma fields where the sum of the speeds of those plasma fields is higher than the speed of light. And that kind of thing allows traveling back in time by crossing the speed of light virtually. 

That thing is possible to make the Tipler cylinder which is multiple layers. When the cylinder's speed is near the speed of light the plasma starts to rotate between those layers. It can make it possible to travel back in time. 

Same way, we could make the spacecraft travel speed that is as close to the speed of light as possible. If the craft's speed is about 99% of the speed of light, that system can fly through the laser or radio waves that increase its energy so high that it turns into a black hole. 

Or it starts to travel back in time. Time travel base is on the idea of time dilation that is proven. If the object's speed is the same as the speed of light that thing stops time. And then if particles cross the speed of light. That thing means time starts to travel backward. 

The speed of light is crossed every day. The reason for the blue sky is Cherenkov's radiation. Cherenkov's radiation forms when particles that come from outer space with the speed of light slow their speed when it arrives in the medium. The speed of light is higher in a vacuum than in a medium. 

And when a particle hits the atmosphere. It releases its energy in form of radiation. During small moments the particle travels faster than the speed of light. The reason for that is: that anything that has mass cannot slow with unlimited speed. So during the slowing time particle sends radiation. And things like neutrino sensors are using the same method. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation

https://artificialintelligenceandindividuals.blogspot.com/

Space is important from the point of view of civil and military.

Image 1) Large-size air-launched rockets can also have an ASAT capacity. 

Space is the last of frontiers. Even if there are rules up there, regular people cannot ever see satellites or they see only their cores. If, they have telescopes. 

Spaceborne positioning is important for GPS-homing, smart munitions. And those munitions are the most effective actors on the battlefield. Also, satellites are the ultimate tools for reconnaissance missions. Military communication satellites are delivering orders to strategic missile submarines. That makes those satellites military targets. 

And they can be like an eye that watches the ground. If military forces can destroy those communication satellites it can deny the SLBM submarines to get their launching codes. Destroying the positioning satellites makes the GPS ammunition ineffective. 

Image 2:) F-15 Releases ASAT

They fly high above Earth. So regular anti-aircraft systems cannot threaten satellites. 

The ground-based ASAT-capable missiles are very large tools. And they are "easy to destroy" if the weapon system can lock to those targets. The ASAT missiles also install in naval vessels. 

Submarine-based ASAT weapons can destroy things like positioning satellites. Many of those land- or sea-based missiles are modified SLBM- or ICBM weapons. But larger rockets like Delta IV and its variants can rise the ASAT weapons to orbital trajectory. 

But ASAT weapons can also install on aircraft. The system that bases F-15 and quite a small missile is interesting. The coordinates upload to the weapon itself. It's connected to the autopilot. Then the ASAT will drive the fighter to the right position and releases itself. And the pilot can fly the aircraft home. 

Image 3:) X-37B

Image 3B:) 

Miniature shuttle, by Virgin Galactic corporation. Similar shuttles can use in the same missions with X-37B.

And one mission of the miniature shuttles like X-37B might work as an ASAT weapon. The air-launched ASAT systems are easy to transport to the way of the targeted satellite's trajectory. Things like the Pegasus rocket can modify into an ASAT missile. And the killer satellite can wait at the orbital trajectory. The small-size satellites can use kinetic energy penetrators. 

Image 4:) Delta IV Medium lifts off. 

Or they can impact their targets like the NASAs Dart probe made to an asteroid.  Also, the positioning and recon satellites can equip with counter-strike systems. Those systems can look like the Israeli "Trophy" system. The counter-strike system itself can be a machine gun that uses "Gyrojet" ammunition. 

Gyrojet is a small rocket. And if that system uses a similar ignition system with the metal storm it denies recoil. In that kind of space machine gun, the back of the weapon is open. And that eliminates the recoil that causes problems for satellites. Maybe Gyrojet was not successful in the Vietnam jungle but the same concept can use in space weapons. 

The idea is that satellites can destroy incoming missiles by using that weapon. But these kinds of systems are also effective against other satellites. 

And the thing is this: weapon race will go to space. GPS satellites, along with spaceborne recon and communication systems, play vital roles in conflicts. So those satellites are a very good target for anti-satellite systems. 

https://www.boeing.com/defense/autonomous-systems/x37b/index.page

https://www.space.com/virgin-orbit-plan-aid-nato-europe

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gyrojet

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trophy_(countermeasure)

Image 1:) https://www.space.com/virgin-orbit-plan-aid-nato-europe

Image 2:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASM-135_ASAT

Image 3:) https://www.boeing.com/defense/autonomous-systems/x37b/index.page

Image 3B:) https://techstory.in/virgin-galactic-secures-faa-approval-to-commercialize-space-tourism/

Image 4:) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Delta_IV